EdZola
CRM & Fundraising

Open-source CRM for nonprofits: CiviCRM vs Frappe CRM

Choose CiviCRM if you want an open-source CRM that already does nonprofit fundraising, membership and events. Choose Frappe CRM if you already run ERPNext, need unlimited users on your own servers, or plan a custom build where the CRM is one part of a bigger system. Either way, “free” means no licence fee, not no cost. This is a deep dive from our comparison of the best CRMs for nonprofits.

Side by side

CiviCRM Frappe CRM
Licence AGPL-3 with the CiviCRM licensing exception AGPL-3.0, source at github.com/frappe/crm
Built for Nonprofits: contributions, memberships, events, mailings, case management Sales teams: leads, deals, email, WhatsApp, calls
Nonprofit fundraising out of the box Yes No; build it, or add Frappe's free Non Profit app (GPL v3, for ERPNext v14/15)
Runs with Usually a website CMS such as WordPress or Drupal The Frappe framework; links to ERPNext
Hosted option Spark, from US$15/month for up to 10,000 contacts Frappe Cloud, from US$5/month per site, unlimited users
Interface Functional, older Modern, fast
Best fit Membership and advocacy charities, UK and US ERPNext users, large teams, custom builds in India

What AGPL means for a nonprofit

Both are under the GNU Affero General Public License. In plain terms: you can use, change and host them free. If you modify the code and let people use it over a network, such as a donor portal, you must make your modified source available to those users. For most nonprofits this is a feature, not a risk: funders that ask for open infrastructure get it, and nobody can lock your data behind a licence. Check with your developer before you combine AGPL code with proprietary code you don’t want to publish.

This matches how we describe Frappe and open source on our platforms page: choose it when large teams make per-user licences expensive, data must stay on your own servers, or a funder expects open infrastructure. Look elsewhere when no one will own hosting, updates and backups.

Worked example: the true cost of “free”

A 40-user Indian nonprofit is choosing between Zoho CRM and open source. Licences for 40 users on Zoho CRM Professional list at about US$11,000 a year. That gap is why open source comes up. Here is the worksheet we use. Fill in your own numbers.

Cost line (per year) CiviCRM (self-hosted) Frappe CRM (Frappe Cloud) What to ask
Hosting Server + backups From US$5/site/month, more for larger plans Who is paged when it goes down?
Upgrades and security patches 4–8 partner days 3–6 partner days How often do major versions ship?
Donor features build Mostly configuration Donation, receipt and recurring-gift build: 20–40 days one-off Can we reuse an existing app?
Indian receipts (80G) and FCRA tagging Custom fields + receipt template Custom doctypes + print format Who maintains the template when forms change?
Internal owner 0.2–0.5 FTE 0.2–0.5 FTE Named person, not "IT"

If the internal owner line reads “nobody”, stop. Open source moves responsibility to you; the licence saving disappears the first time an unpatched server leaks a donor list. India’s DPDP Act makes that more expensive, not less (see our plain-English guide to the DPDP Act for NGOs).

Open source is a good fit if you can answer yes to all three: (1) a named person owns hosting, upgrades and backups; (2) you have a partner or developer for at least 12 months; (3) you need either unlimited users, self-hosting, or code ownership for a funder.

When CiviCRM wins

  • You are a membership, campaigning or events-heavy charity.
  • You want nonprofit fundraising features without building them.
  • You are in the UK or US, where CiviCRM partners and Gift Aid extensions are easier to find.

When Frappe CRM wins

  • You already run ERPNext for accounts, HR or inventory and want one stack.
  • You have 30+ users and per-user licences are the blocker.
  • You need the CRM to be part of a custom system with programme or field data.
  • You want a modern interface staff will actually open.

When neither is right

A team of five with no technical staff should not self-host anything. Start on Bigin or Bloomerang. Our sibling piece, Zoho Bigin vs Zoho CRM for small NGOs, shows what a light start looks like.

Find your CRM in 10 minutes

Take the free 10-minute technology assessment and bring your CRM picker result: we’ll tell you which option fits, what it will cost to run, and when a CRM isn’t your first problem at all.

Start with one part of the work that feels harder than it should.

Bring one tracker, form or workflow. We’ll help you find a practical first step, whether that means a clearer process, a connected system or better use of what you already have.

Prefer email? [email protected]

EDZOLA NEWSLETTER

Hear more about the work, once a month.

Subscribe for practical ideas, field notes and updates from EdZola’s work with social-impact organisations.

A monthly email from EdZola. You can unsubscribe at any time.